Showing posts with label Advisors. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Advisors. Show all posts

Thursday, February 27, 2014

NPR Broadcasts "Managing Your Elderly Parents' Finances"


On Thursday morning (11:06 AM to Noon), February 27, 2014, The Diane Rehm Show, as broadcast from WAMU through the National Public Radio network, focused on the topic Managing Your Elderly Parents' Finances, with guest host Elise Labott.

The highly-qualified and well-spoken guests were:
    Sally Hurme, Project Advisor, Education and Outreach, at AARP
    Naomi Karp, Senior Policy Analyst, Office for Older Americans, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
    Elizabeth Loewy, Chief, Elder Abuse Unit, Special Victims/Special Prosecutions Bureau, New York County District Attorney's Office
This is the overview of the program topic:
Millions of elderly Americans suffer from dementia, Alzheimer’s disease and other disabilities that make them unable to make decisions about their finances. 

About a quarter of all people over the age of 65 rely on relatives, often their children, for help managing their money and assets. But the task of caring for elderly parents and managing their bills and property can be overwhelming and time consuming. It can also be filled with ethical and legal pitfalls and a source of family conflict.
Two of these guests were quoted recently in an article by Ann Carrns, in The New York Times published October 30, 2013, entitled New Guidelines Aim to Help Financial Caregivers. So I knew that these guests were experts.

As I listened, I heard accurate information and sound advice, without one error or overstatement. The discussion covered such concerns as:
  • Need for reliable and appropriate assistance for elderly relatives by family members who care
  • Mental capacity and incapacity 
  • Changeability of circumstances faced by elderly relatives
  • Nature of services involving banks, businesses, investments, bills, living expenses, and medical costs
  • Accountability by, and communications among, persons providing assistance or care
  • Fiduciary responsibilities under a power of attorney or trust 
  • Conflicts of interest of a family member with an elderly person
  • Potentials for personal and financial abuse of a vulnerable adult 
  • Roles of family members and assistance by community, government, or church organizations
  • Planning processes -- when and how
  • Helpful advisors, including attorneys, accountants, bankers, and special service organizations
  • Devices for financial management, including direct deposits and payments, online banking, joint bank accounts (including problems with survivorship designations, versus "convenience" accounts), Social Security representative payees, agent appointments under a power of attorney document, voluntary trust arrangements, and court-ordered guardianship
  • Scams, such as those involving mortgages, lottery awards, and telemarketing
  • Reports of suspected abuse to local law enforcement, abuse hotlines, or special elder abuse investigation units  
During the program, more than twenty comments from listeners accumulated [increased to 37 comments as of March 8, 2014] that shared personal experiences and raised questions.

The program's webpage provided links to accurate, helpful resources:

Tuesday, November 08, 2011

"Tax Talk Today" Online


Browsing through the Trusts & Estates website recently, I noted a useful learning service regarding federal tax laws and return preparation, available on the Internet: Tax Talk Today.
Sponsored by the Internal Revenue Service, Tax Talk Today is a live Internet program featuring industry tax experts and professionals and top representatives from the IRS.
Each program features discussions, real time interaction and the opportunity for viewers to participate in the discussion by e-mailing questions directly to the studio. Late-breaking news from the IRS may augment or pre-empt original programming, making Tax Talk Today a primary you heard it here first source of news about IRS initiatives, rules and decisions.
In addition to the Live webcast, the FREE programs are available for up to 12 months through Tax Talk Today archives, as audio Podcasts or on DVD (perfect for conducting group viewings or for staff training).
This service began in 2001 as a public service of the IRS, according to "Website of the Month: Tax Talk Today" (2004), by  Susan B. Anders, posted by The CPA Journal, published by the New York State Society of CPAs.  Since 2009, the presentations have been produced by Tax Talk Today, Inc., a private company in Bethesda, MD, with content provided by tax-related companies in coordination with the IRS .

Tax Talk Today is promoted as a free service for those "auditing" presentations -- that is, those who do not expect to receive certified professional education credits.  Without payment (but still with a required online registration), you can replay any presentation, either live or archived, over an Internet-connected device.  Also, you can read the word-for-word transcripts of any past session, including any post-presentation supplemental materials.
Free of charge, viewers can tune in to each program and watch live, in addition to watching for up to 12 months by going to the Archives, or listening to the Audio Podcasts.
Earning CPE credit requires a purchase.* * *
The topics are varied, current, and important for tax professionals.  Past presentations are archived for a year, so listening or retrieving materials can be done conveniently.

Examples of archived presentations in 2011 instructive for a trust and estates lawyer, an accountant/preparer, or a consumer interested in this federal tax principles and procedures, include:
To watch a presentation or access transcripts of past sessions, you must first provide an email address and create a password, then reply to an automated message sent to that email address.  When you log in for the first time, you must complete a registration form with basic information.

All that is simple.  Far harder is recalling what email address and password you supplied originally -- so keep both with your tax records.
"Our office thinks these tax talk sessions are a great idea.
An easy way of getting information out."
-- A Tax Talk Today participant

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Video: Getting Started in Estate Planning

Forbes' video network online posted, on September 15, 2010, a short segment entitled Estate Planning:  How to Get Started, starring Deborah L. Jacobs, the author of the recently-published book Estate Planning Smarts.

Her advice during the interview impresses the need for personal planning, and urges that this not "be done at home" due to the pitfalls and pain that can result.  Pain avoidance is a real motivator, since "[a]bove all, estate planning is a way to take care of yourself and the people you love."

Her book's website notes that, "[r]egardless of your net worth, a good estate plan should accomplish these essential goals:
  • Caring for yourself by authorizing people to handle your affairs if you no longer can because of illness or disability
  • Specifying who gets what after you pass away
  • Providing for children who are minors or who have special needs.
In my blog posting on September 29, 2010, I noted an article written by Deborah L. Jacobs entitled Do-It-Yourself Wills, a No-No.  I agreed with Deborah that "DYI" should not be an option in personal and estate planning.

However, thorough preparation -- in learning about this area of the law, in listing your personal goals and obstacles, and in summarizing your situation (your holdings & income, versus your debts & commitments) -- is very important.

Pairing a prepared client with a qualified professional should result in a good outcome.

Tuesday, January 06, 2009

Stealing Houses by Words and Deeds

On December 8, 2008, the new Uniform Municipal Deed Registration Act took effect in Pennsylvania, providing a more timely process for recording deeds in counties and also for registering deeds in local municipalities.

Its purpose is to counteract
land fraud by requiring prompt public recording of land transfer documents and by allowing municipalities to set additional local requirements in a uniform manner.

The PA UMDRA was signed into law on October 9, 2008 as Act 110 of 2008 (formerly H.B. 1634, P.N. 4003). It establishes uniform procedures for a local municipality to provide a registry for deeds or conveyances in addition to the recording of documents with a county recorder of deeds. A municipality cannot require a county to effect a parallel municipal registration of such documents, but a municipality and a county's recorder of deeds may enter into an agreement whereby the county will share information regarding conveyances of property.

The Intelligencer (Philadelphia, PA) published an article on December 24, 2008, entitled "
New law helps limit deed fraud" by Amanda Cregan, who quoted the Montgomery County Recorder of Deeds as to the new law's effect:

Montgomery County Recorder of Deeds Nancy J. Becker says the new law not only streamlines the process among municipalities and counties, but also protects the new homeowner.

“We're really delighted because, if for any reason, if there is a delay in recording a deed, the possibility of fraud being committed against that property increases,” said Becker, in her fifth year in office. “If people aren't paying attention and deeds aren't being recorded in a timely fashion, then things can happen.”

In the gap between when a homeowner purchases a home and when the deed is recorded, a thief can obtain a copy of that deed and have it transferred fraudulently. * * *

Land fraud, based on bogus conveyancing documents, can occur. See: "Scam Alert: Bad Deeds" by Sid Kirchheimer, published in the AARP Bulletin (Dec., 2008), as reposted online by the Montgomery County Recorder of Deeds Office.

Retransfer of
The Empire State Building, in New York City, took only ninety minutes, as reported by The New York Daily News in "It took 90 minutes for Daily News to 'steal' the Empire State Building" (12/02/08) by William Sherman.
In one of the biggest heists in American history, the Daily News "stole" the $2 billion Empire State Building.

And it wasn't that hard.

The News swiped the 102-story Art Deco skyscraper by drawing up a batch of bogus documents, making a fake notary stamp and filing paperwork with the city to transfer the deed to the property. * * *

The massive ripoff illustrates a gaping loophole in the city's system for recording deeds, mortgages and other transactions.

The loophole: The system -- run by the office of the city register -- doesn't require clerks to verify the information. * * *

"Crooks go where the money is. That's why Willie Sutton robbed banks, and this is the new bank robbery," said Brooklyn Assistant District Attorney Richard Farrell, who is prosecuting several deed fraud cases. * * *

One Pennsylvania city, Philadelphia, experienced so many land fraud cases, its Council and Mayor acted to curb abuse. According to "Philadelphia City Council Amends Deed Recording Standards " (08/08/08) posted by the PA Notary Blog, hosted by the Pennsylvania Association of Notaries, "as of April 2008, Philadelphia had received 454 reports of suspected land fraud since 2000."

Philadelphia City Council unanimously passed a bill that amends Title 2 of the Philadelphia Code.

The amendment adds a new chapter providing that prior to the recording of any deed, a check of record ownership must be conducted by the Department of Records.

Appropriate documentation must be submitted to the Department with certain deeds for the delivery of deeds to the Department of Records must meet certain requirements. Finally, the record owner must be notified prior to the recording of any deed. * * *

Mayor Michael Nutter signed the bill on Aug. 14, and the ordinance will go into effect on Nov. 3 [, 2008]. * * *

See also: "Philadelphia Changes Deed Recording Requirements" (11/04/08) posted on the notaries' blog.

PA's new Act was noted by The Home Equity Theft Reporter in a posting on December 28, 2008, entitled "New Pennsylvania Law To Make It Tougher For Deed Theft Scammers To Heist Homes."

For consumers or fiduciaries, however, the new law should be transparent in effect, according to The Intelligencer's article:
Homeowners shouldn't worry about the new changes, said Bucks County Recorder of Deeds Edward R. Gudknecht.

“Most of the time your title companies and the attorneys that deal in real estate will make sure this is followed through,” he said.

Monday, December 22, 2008

IRS Implements Final Return Preparer Regs

On December 22, 2008, the Internal Revenue Service published Treasury Decision 9436, which finalized "Tax Return Preparer Penalties Under Sections 6694 and 6695."

TD 9436 contains final regulations implementing amendments to the tax return preparer penalties under sections 6694 and 6695 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) and related provisions under sections 6060, 6107, 6109, 6696, and 7701(a)(36) reflecting amendments to the Code made by section 8246 of the Small Business and Work Opportunity Tax Act of 2007 and section 506 of the Tax Extenders and Alternative Minimum Tax Relief Act of 2008.

The final regulations affect tax return preparers and provide guidance regarding the amended provisions.

These regulations are effective on December 22, 2008. * * *
These regulations are the culmination of a long process conducted by the IRS, through successive statutory enactments and periodic administrative regulations (temporary, proposed, or final).

In addition to new standards of preparation of federal tax returns, a preparer will also be required to generate more "paperwork", according to the Paperwork Reduction Act Summary, provided in T.D. 9436:
This information is necessary
  • to make the record of the name, taxpayer identification number, and principal place of work of each tax return preparer,
  • [to] make each return or claim for refund prepared available for inspection by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, and
  • to document that the tax return preparer advised the taxpayer of the penalty standards applicable to the taxpayer in order for the tax return preparer to avoid penalties under section 6694.
The collection of information is required to comply with the provisions of section 8246 of the Small Business and Work Opportunity Tax Act of 2007 and section 506 of the Tax Extenders and Alternative Minimum Tax Relief Act of 2008. [Links & formatting added.]
Find updated information (summaries and legislative text) regarding the 2007 Tax Act and the 2008 Tax Act posted on the Legislation page of the website of the U.S. Senate Finance Committee.

The scheduled publication of T.D. 9436 in the Federal Register followed its announcement on December 16, 2008, by the IRS, together with related guidance regarding return preparer penalties:
  • T.D. 9436 (PDF, 211 pages) -- Final regulations under IRC §§ 6694 and 6695A
  • Notice 2009-5 (PDF, 10 pages) -- Interim guidance on the application of T.D. 9436
  • Rev. Proc. 2009-11 (PDF, 22 pages) -- List of forms subject to the return preparer penalties
See also: Updated Guidance Concerning Tax Return Preparer Penalties Released (T.D. 9436; Notice 2009-5; Rev. Proc. 2009-11) posted 12/16/08 by CCH; and "IRS Revises Tax Return Preparer Penalty Regulations" (12/17/08) posted by WebCPA.

According to the "Background" section of T.D. 9436, the
2007 Tax Act had changed the standards affecting tax preparers on both disclosed positions and undisclosed positions:
The 2007 Act's amendments to section 6694 also changed the standards of conduct that tax return preparers must meet in order to avoid imposition of penalties in the event that a return prepared results in an understatement of tax.

For undisclosed positions, the 2007 Act replaced the "realistic possibility'' standard with a standard requiring the tax return preparer to have a "reasonable belief that the position would more likely than not be sustained on its merits.''

For disclosed positions, the 2007 Act replaced the "not-frivolous'' standard with a standard requiring the tax return preparer to have a "reasonable basis'' for the tax treatment of the position. * * * [Formatting added.]
The 2008 Tax Act further altered the standards regarding tax returns with undisclosed positions or for tax shelters:
On October 3, 2008, section 506 of the 2008 Act modified the standards of conduct that tax return preparers must meet in order to avoid imposition of the section 6694(a) penalty.

Specifically, the 2008 Act changed the standard for undisclosed positions from "reasonable belief that the position more likely than not will be sustained on the
merits'' to "substantial authority for the position.''

The 2008 Act maintained the "reasonable basis'' standard for disclosed positions.

If a position is with respect to a tax shelter (as defined in section 6662(d)(2)(C)(ii)) or a reportable transaction to which section 6662A applies, it must be "reasonable to believe that the position more likely than not will be sustained on the merits.'' * * * [Formatting added.]
T.D. 9436 was based upon proposed regulations recently published. See: PA EE&F Law Blog posting "IRS Proposes Final Preparer Penalty Regs"(07/02/08).

There were some changes reflecting public comments, as explained under its heading "Summary of Comments and Explanation of Revisions."

T.D. 9436
also provides "interim guidance" regarding new provisions in the 2008 Tax Act. Those interim regulations will be finalized through future federal rule-making procedures.

After consideration of the public comments and the amendments made by the 2008 Act, the proposed regulations are adopted as revised by this Treasury decision.

Section 1.6694-2 of these final regulations does not provide substantive guidance reflecting amendments to the Code
made by the 2008 Act.

Rather, the Treasury Department and the IRS are reserving Sec. 1.6694-2(c) in these final regulations and are simultaneously issuing a notice in the Internal Revenue Bulletin providing interim guidance on the amendments to the Code made by the
2008 Act.* * * [Formatting added.]
Few accountants, attorneys, or tax preparation officers remain unfamiliar with these substantial duties and significant penalties involving returns they sign as "preparer" for filing with the IRS.

In 2009, many taxpayers will learn from their tax preparers that the rules of the game for tax returns have changed.

 Estimated total annual [paperwork] reporting burden:
10,679,320 hours.
Estimated average annual burden per respondent:
15.6 hours.
-- Internal Revenue Service, T.D. 9436 (12/22/08)

Monday, September 22, 2008

"Liquid Trust" or "Living Trustworthiness"?

In the midst of the greatest economic crisis since the onset of The Great Depression, I pondered approaches, and now endorse one.

Since these problems are based in fear, which then create a lack of faith in business partners and among consumers, we need to restore trust, which can regenerate liquidity of funds and permit long-term workouts.

Could a simple solution be found in a bottle?


Liquid Trust is produced by Vero Labs. It is one of many such products based upon human pheromones, which are explained by Wikipedia:

A pheromone (from Greek φέρω phero "to bear" + ‘ορμόνη "hormone") is a chemical that triggers a natural behavioral response in another member of the same species.

There are alarm pheromones, food trail pheromones, sex pheromones, and many others that affect behavior or physiology. * * *
The vendor claims that its enhanced Liquid Trust can restore a feeling of trust, by employing, Oxytocin:
Liquid Trust is the world's first product that contains Oxytocin the hormone that controls the level of trust and security in people.

Scientists have proven that the hormone Oxytocin, is largely responsible for who we trust. If your boss, manager or employees have high levels of Oxytocin, you have a much better chance of getting a raise or promotion. * * *


When you spray Liquid Trust on yourself, you are gaining an instant competitive edge. Your manager and other co-workers will immediately feel strong bonds to you and your ideas.

This will actually help you get ahead because they will trust you and the work that you do. * * *
The original version of Liquid Trust was released in 2006, according to "Liquid Trust in a Bottle: New Oxytocin Product Has Hit the Market" (08/11/06) by Tori, posted by Associated Content.
Liquid Trust is a spray that comes in a little bottle that oddly resembles a nail polish bottle (in my opinion). * * *

According to their website, “There are different ways of increasing the Oxytocin levels in the people you interact with. Scientists say that simply touching someone who you are talking to, makes them produce Oxytocin.

When that happens, they start to form a very strong bond with you. They trust you." * * *
See also: "Human Pheromone Reviews - Liquid Trust" by Kyle Macrannell, posted on EZine Articles.

Many other marketed products contain pheromones, intending different results in human interactions.
See: "Most effective 'Pheromone' Product Reviews" (07/02/08), which reviewed seven products (but not "Liquid Trust"). For accounts of users' personal experiences with various products, see: "Liquid Trust" on PheromoneTalk.

However, predictable effects of pheromones remain under research, according to "Pheromones, in context" (10/02/02), by Etienne Benson, posted by American Psychological Association Online. She interviewed knowledgeable scientists, who highlighted actual research on pheromones.

She concluded that scientific research can only suggest, but not predict, specific effects of pheromones on human behavior, and therefore cannot endorse vendors' promotional claims.

It can be concluded, however, that pheromones do have a purpose:

"In animals, [pheromones] are involved very strongly in care of offspring, in recognizing members of your social group, in recognizing family members," [Martha McClintock, PhD] says.

"In thinking about what the normal function might be, we know from the animal work that we need to think broadly in social terms and that the same compound might serve differently in different contexts." * * *
Our basic biological systems sought to protect us from threats, and to promote survival, through coded material transferred naturally and interpreted in feelings by each of us.

Now, on a grand scale, the activities of financial markets are characterized by anonymity, fungibility, separation, and complexity. No one but insiders can use the "smell test" that has preserved our race in other settings.

So, pheromones won't work to guide us through a financial crisis. Indeed, their use would mislead us and mask reality.

Instead, we must rely upon societal values that promote responsible financial behavior -- the age-old, religion-endorsed, standards of honesty and accountability, which I call "living trustworthiness."

Remember what "trust" means in social and personal contexts:
Trust is a relationship of reliance.

A trusted party is presumed to seek to fulfill policies, ethical codes, law and their previous promises.


Trust does not need to involve belief in the good character, vices, or morals of the other party. Persons engaged in a criminal activity usually trust each other to some extent. Also trust does not need to include an action that you and the other party are mutually engaged in.

Trust is a prediction of reliance on an action, based on what a party knows about the other party. Trust is a statement about what is otherwise unknown -- for example, because it is far away, cannot be verified, or is in the future. * * *
Recommitment by Americans to act with "living trustworthiness" is essential. An accompanying reworking of our laws mandating "living trustworthiness" in financial dealings will institutionalize this commitment. Such laws, with provisions for disclosure, notices, source reports, periodic revaluations, investor reviews, administrative regulation, and personal responsibility, must be a societal substitute for the pheromones that our bodies developed for the very same purposes -- feeling trust in others.

Can "living trustworthiness" on a large scale be implemented?

It could, if lawmakers, business leaders, and citizens would each act as the unnamed character in the classic poem by Edgar A. Guest, "It Couldn't Be Done."

Update: 09/22/08 @ 5:30 pm:

Of all the articles I've read about implementing reforms, this one, sent to me by an MAI-rated real estate appraiser, makes the most sense, using a nuts-and-bolts approach taught by experience.

I highly recommend reading "Restoring Confidence: Learning From the S&L Crisis To Address the Subprime Mortgage Problem" (PDF, 8 pages) by Thomas Inserra, a former Resolution Trust Corporation trustee.

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

"National Estate Planning Awareness Week"

On September 12, 2008, the National Association of Estate Planners and Councils and the NAEPC Foundation issued a Press Release entitled "National Estate Planning Awareness Week Declared" announcing "the third full week in October of each calendar year to be National Estate Planning Awareness Week."

Designating such a week for public education about effective estate planning is consistent with the
mission statement of NAEPC, as noted in the Press Release:

The National Association of Estate Planners & Councils and The NAEPC Foundation work together to provide continuing education for our 26,000 local council member professionals from all the disciplines involved in estate planning and to encourage multi-disciplinary cooperation so all the professionals (law, accounting, life insurance professional, trust administration and financial planning) review the plan to be sure that no aspect has been neglected. * * *
A problem recognized by NAEPC is that "[e]state planning is consistently identified as a tool lacking in the majority of American households."

More specifically, the Press Release noted a 2004 survey from Lawyers.com finding that:
58 percent of Americans lack a basic will, generally considered to be the first document in an individual's estate plan.

In addition, 69 percent lack a
living will or medical directive (both documents communicate an individuals wishes for medical life support if that person is terminally ill or permanently unconscious).

Only one-in-five, or 21%, have created a trust as a part of his/her estate plan.


Most Americans cite insufficient assets or not being old enough as their reason for not creating an estate plan. * * *
See also: EE&F Law Blog posting "Surveys Show Most Lack Last Will" (07/03/08).

In response, NAEPC devised an annual Estate Planning Awareness Week, with locally focused Estate Planning Days, for promotion by the hundreds of its affiliated estate planning councils located throughout the United States.

In an effort to combat this often-missed but critically important process, these two organizations have teamed up to encourage their network of 200+ affiliated local estate planning councils to present publicly-focused Estate Planning Day programs between October 20, 2008 and October 26, 2008. * * *
The Press Release urges consumers to "[c]heck with your local estate planning council to see if it will be hosting such a program this year. * * *

Searching NAEPC's website reveals these fourteen regional estate planning councils in Pennsylvania:
There are other local, independent estate planning councils in Pennsylvania not affiliated with NAEPC that perform much the same mission among member professionals and in their communities.

All estate planning councils in Pennsylvania -- whether or not affiliated with NAEPC -- have been listed in the sidebar of this Blog since its inception.

NAEPC's approach for the initial, annual National Estate Planning Awareness Week, including a locally-designated Estate Planning Day, is explained in its planning materials.

We provide materials for use by our 200+ local estate planning councils in holding an informative Estate Planning Day program for their community.

We anticipate many more estate planning councils joining the ranks of the councils, which annually hold such a program, when we all celebrate Estate Planning Awareness Week on October 20 through 26, 2008.

We sincerely hope that the public will become aware of estate planning and, before it is too late, seek guidance from professionals who are educated, licensed, experienced and credentialed.

Look for such a program in your area, or, better yet, as a professional, plan one!

Tuesday, September 09, 2008

Proposed Fed Regs on Retirement Plans

On August 21, 2008, the U.S. Department of Labor issued a Press Release entitled "U.S. Labor Department proposes rules on investment advice exemption for 401(k) plans and IRAs" that announced publication the next day of proposed regulations to govern rendering of investment advice for 401(k) and IRA plans.

The U.S. Department of Labor today announced publication of two proposed rules under the Pension Protection Act (PPA) to make investment advice more accessible for millions of Americans in 401(k) type plans and individual retirement accounts (IRAs). * * *

"These proposals would give workers greater access to investment advice so that they are better equipped to manage and monitor their 401(k) plans and Individual Retirement Accounts," said U.S. Secretary of Labor Elaine L. Chao.

The PPA amended the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) by adding a new prohibited transaction exemption that allows greater flexibility for participants of 401(k) plans and IRAs to obtain investment advice.

One of the ways in which investment advice may be given under the exemption is through the use of a computer model certified as unbiased, the other is through an adviser compensated on a "level-fee" basis.

Several other requirements also must be satisfied, including disclosure of fees the adviser is to receive. * * *

The proposed regulations were published in the Federal Register on August 22, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 164) by the Employee Benefits Security Administration as document 49896–49923 [E8–19272] entitled Investment Advice; Participants and Beneficiaries (also available in PDF format as amendments to 29 CFR Parts 2550, 29 pages).

This is the "Summary" of the proposed regulations, as contained in the published notice:
This document contains proposed regulations implementing the provisions of the statutory exemption set forth in sections 408(b)(14) and 408(g) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, as amended (ERISA or the Act), and parallel provisions in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (Code), relating to the provision of investment advice described in the Act by a fiduciary adviser to participants and beneficiaries in participant-directed individual account plans, such as 401(k) plans, and beneficiaries of individual retirement accounts (and certain similar plans).

Section 408(b)(14) provides an exemption from certain prohibited transaction provisions in ERISA with respect to the provision of investment advice, the investment transaction entered into pursuant to the advice, and the direct or indirect receipt of fees or other compensation by the fiduciary adviser or an affiliate in connection with the provision of advice or the transaction pursuant to the advice.

Section 408(g) describes the conditions under which the investment advice related transactions are exempt.

Upon adoption, the regulations will affect sponsors, fiduciaries, participants and beneficiaries of participant-directed individual account plans, as well as providers of investment and investment advice-related services to such plans.
The Press Release solicited comments on the proposed regulations, which are due by October 6, 2008:

Written comments on the investment advice proposals should be addressed to the Office of Regulations and Interpretation, Employee Benefits Security Administration, Room N-5665, U. S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20210, Attn: Investment Advice Regulations.

The public also may submit comments electronically by email to
e-ori@dol.gov, or through the federal e-rulemaking portal at www.regulations.gov.
On September 8, 2008, Blaine F. Aikin, the President and CEO of Fiduciary 360 LP, in Sewickley, PA, expressed concerns about the proposed regulations in an article entitled "Can brokers be fiduciaries?" posted on Investment News.

He evaluated the new
DOL guidelines as "a problematic development."
Judging by newly proposed regulations on investment advice, it looks as if the Department of Labor is trying hard to engineer a sharp turn from the course established by Congress. * * *

[T]he DOL simultaneously proposed a new class exemption to allow commission-based registered representatives to become fiduciary advisers and give advice to participants and beneficiaries of participant-directed retirement plans and individual retirement accounts.

The new class exemption is a very big change that the DOL contended will "increase the variety of investment advice arrangements that are available and potentially lower the cost and promote the marketing of such arrangements, to the benefit of participants." * * *

The DOL has seized on the opportunity created by the act to expand on the idea that most investors need advice. It chose to do so in two ways.

First, it would extend the regulations to address advice given to IRA account holders.

Second, it proposed to allow conflicted financial services reps to give advice in competition with the fiduciary advisers contemplated under the act. * * *

Aikin noted that the first component is consistent with Congressional intention, but the second is not. He concluded: "Whether investors will in fact benefit hinges upon whether all fiduciary advisers will be able to adapt to the new rules, and the fiduciary standard of care they are designed to promote, quickly and effectively."

For Aikin's more generic recommendations regarding a fiduciary's conduct in an investment setting, see: "A warning light for fiduciaries -- What you can do about the increasing risk of litigation from disgruntled investor" (06/09/08).

"A nickel isn't worth a dime today."

-- Yogi Berra, quoted in "Yogi Berra's 7 secrets to building wealth" (01/02/08) by Karen Datko posted on MSN Money

Thursday, August 28, 2008

New Online Senior Housing Locator

On July 21, 2008, the National Association of Area Agencies on Aging (n4a) introduced a new "online navigational tool to help older adults search for senior housing, no matter where they live." The resource was described in n4a's Press Release, entitled "National Association of Area Agencies on Aging rolls out nationwide senior housing resource during annual meeting in Nashville."

Powered by SNAPforSeniors®, the Senior Housing Locator makes objective, nationwide information available 24-hours a day, seven days a week through the convenience of the Internet.

Consumers and professionals alike will now have access to the n4a Senior Housing Locator through a link on n4a.org.

The tool allows users to search a database of more than 60,000 senior housing listings, including all licensed senior housing in the nation.

Member Area Agencies on Aging (AAAs) and Title VI Native American Aging Programs will be invited to add a link to the tool or use a version co-branded for their own website.* * *
The Press Release explained how the Senior Housing Locator is similar to the existing Real Estate Multi-Listing Service maintained by Realtors®, but is targeted towards the specific needs of senior citizens as residents, and Aging Agencies as facilitators searching for appropriate facilities.

It is a free service "developed by SNAPforSeniors, representing another example of cooperative relationships among the aging network and private sector organizations." It is devoid of advertising, however, which suggests a more trustworthy service.

The Senior Housing Locator is similar to the real estate industry’s Multiple Listing Service, and functions much like a traditional search engine.

Users can search a database of assisted living communities, nursing homes, residential care facilities, continuing care retirement communities and a growing list of independent living communities, all at the click of a mouse.

Many listings provide information about care services, lifestyle amenities, payment options and more, with some including photo galleries and virtual tours. * * *


Eve Stern, RN, MS, president of SNAPforSeniors, [said] * * * “[T]he fact that all licensed communities are included eliminates the bias that referral services and advertising-based listing services exhibit.”
The varieties of licenced housing available to senior citizens in the various states make searching confusing, and the new search resource attempts to sort out the facility types:
There are 247 different senior housing license types in the United States. According to SNAPforSeniors, the inconsistency from state-to-state is a common source of confusion when it comes to finding housing in another area.

To help remedy this, the n4a Senior Housing Locator provides definitions for all 247 license types. Medicare certified facility listings also include a link directly to that facility’s quality report on Nursing Home Compare.* * *
About a week later, the new senior housing online search resource was promoted in a Press Release entitled "Society of Certified Senior Advisors introduces comprehensive online resource to clients in need of senior housing" (07/29/08) issued by the Society of Certified Senior Advisors®, of Denver, CO, the world’s largest membership organization educating and certifying professionals who serve seniors.

Its immediate involvement is an example of the "co-branding" offered and sought by
n4a.
Through the Alliance Network Program, SNAPforSeniors licenses and private-labels its database and search tools to the websites of leading trusted sources, including the Alzheimer's Association and the Case Management Society of America. * * *
For more information about SNAPforSeniors, read its "Frequently Asked Questions" online. It is listed in Google's online "Senior Living Directories and Helps" that offers additional online resources.

Friday, August 01, 2008

Websites on Estate & Financial Planning

Forbes magazine offered a "Best of the Web Directory" in 2005 that included a section on "Estate Planning" websites; and those listings remain useful for consumers seeking orientation on basic estate and financial planning concepts.

The listings by Forbes were comprehensive as to consumer topics:

[Y]ou can find more than 3,000 sites reviewed by Forbes.com Best of The Web, each selected according to five criteria: Content, Design, Speed, Navigation and Customization.
In prefacing the "Estate Planning" list of websites, Forbes representative Leigh Gallagher explained why consumers might benefit from reviewing them:
It's never too early to start planning for your legacy. But if you haven't started yet, the Web offers more resources than ever to learn the basics and to keep up with ever changing estate planning laws.

We all have to go someday -- but being prepared can make a world of difference for those you leave behind.
These are the estate planning websites recommended by Forbes:
Another Forbes representative, Nikhil Hutheesing, produced a separate, slightly longer, distinct list of websites on the related topic of "Financial Planning" described as follows:

There is a giant bulge of Boomers now beginning to realize that they are closer to retirement age than they would like to be.

Many are turning to financial planners, but the first thing these Web savvy workaholics typically do is see if they can help themselves by going online.

The sites below all cater to self-directed investors wanting to take control of their financial health. Some of the sites also offer referrals to advisers or have made their best services available only through advisers.

There are a few holdouts that provide a wide range of tools and assessment -- for a fee in most cases -- but most financial planning sites just provide articles, conveniences like bill payment programs, and simple calculators.

That list of fifteen websites providing information about financial planning can be found here.

Both these topical listings were cataloged under a broader heading of
"Personal Finance & Careers" that contained other interesting topics, such as 401(k) Advice, Financial Calculators, Legal Advice, Life Insurance, Mortgages, and Tax Planning. And then there was my favorite: Time Management.

Keeping in mind the passage of time since the selections, and the self-interest or promotional messages
interwoven by some of the vendors into their posted materials, nevertheless the vendor and association websites selected by Forbes still offer considerable resources for consumers today.

Friday, July 25, 2008

Hedge Funds as an Investment, Pt. II

Fiduciaries investigating hedge funds as an investment should read the Press Release, dated April 15, 2008, issued by the United States Treasury entitled "PWG Private-Sector Committees Release Best Practices for Hedge Fund Participants" (HP-927).

It announced release of a report, which should become "required reading" for any fiduciary contemplating hedge fund investments: the "Report of the Investors' Committee to the President's Working Group on Financial Markets" (PDF format, 205 KB, 63 pages).


I asked in yesterday's posting
Hedge Funds as an Investment, Pt. I, "What should a fiduciary know about hedge funds?" This Report contains the answers.

The Press Release summarized the importance of the Report:

Two blue-ribbon private-sector committees established by the President's Working Group released separate yet complementary sets of best practices for hedge fund investors and asset managers today, in the most comprehensive public-private effort to increase accountability for participants in this industry. * * *
The Press Release (also available in PDF format here) noted the fast-paced, high-level, top-priority nature of the study that led to the Report's issuance:

The PWG tasked the committees, selected in September 2007 and comprised of well-respected asset managers and investors, with collaborating on industry issues and developing a set of best practices for their respective groups of stakeholders. Their work was based on the PWG's Principles and Guidelines Regarding Private Pools of Capital issued in February 2007, which sought to enhance investor protections and systemic risk safeguards. The best practices may be viewed at the committees' websites, www.amaicmte.org.

The PWG includes the heads of the U.S. Treasury Department, the Federal Reserve, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

The best practices for the asset managers call on hedge funds to adopt comprehensive best practices in all aspects of their business, including the critical areas of disclosure, valuation of assets, risk management, business operations, compliance and conflicts of interest. * * *

During that process, on September 17, 2007, a Pennsylvanian, Blaine F. Aikin (managing partner and chief knowledge officer of fi360, of Sewickley, PA), published an article in the "international newspaper of money management", Pensions & Investments, also posted online, entitled "Hedge funds present fiduciary hurdles"?

His excellent article began with a caution to fiduciaries regarding hedge funds:

While it might be true that no investment is inherently imprudent, some start with a presumption of guilt until proven innocent.

Hedge funds fit into this category because of the inherent hurdles they present to fulfilling a fiduciary’s duties to their client. * * *
He then proposed a five-part inquiry by any fiduciary who contemplated a hedge fund investment:

1. Are you permitted to hold this type of investment?

2. Do you believe financial markets are inefficient and that such inefficiencies are exploitable?

3. Can you adequately evaluate the positions held in the hedge fund investment and the associated risks of those positions?

4. Are the fees and expenses of hedge funds fair and reasonable?

5. What recourse do you have if something goes wrong?

After explaining the risks underlying, and reasons for, each inquiry, he offered this advice:

Only after you have considered these questions and conclusively proven that your fiduciary duties are being met can you feel comfortable in selecting hedge fund investments.

Fiduciaries operate in a special relationship of trust and legal and ethical responsibility for managing the money of others. When it comes to hedge fund investing, the obligations attendant to the fiduciary role point directly to the line of inquiry presented above.

In my view, the hurdles that must be cleared to justify making hedge fund investments are too high for most fiduciaries. Those that do decide to proceed down the hedge fund path should be prepared to demonstrate that they did so properly by having a compelling case for their conduct prepared in advance.

When, on April 15, 2008, U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson, Jr. made remarks upon the issuance of the Report, reproduced in a Press Release, entitled "Secretary Paulson Opening Remarks at Release of Best Practice Recommendations by PWG Private Sector Committees" (HP-926), he mirrored the need for accountability regarding private pooled investments, including hedge funds:
Last September, experienced industry professionals from some of the most respected institutions agreed to serve on two new committees to address market issues and develop "best practices" for private pools of capital – one from the perspective of investors and one from the perspective of asset managers.

The President's Working Group encouraged the committees to use the PWG principles and guidelines as the foundation for their best practices, and they have done so. As we said when announcing these committees --- we want the world's highest investor protection standards; we want to guard against systemic risk and keep the United States the most competitive financial marketplace in the world. * * *
The Press Release (HP-926) noted key components of the Report:

The best practices for investors include a Fiduciary's Guide and an Investor's Guide.

The Fiduciary's Guide provides recommendations to individuals charged with evaluating the appropriateness of hedge funds as a component of an investment portfolio.

The Investor's Guide provides recommendations to those charged with executing and administering a hedge fund program once a hedge fund has been added to the investment portfolio. * * *

Both best practices documents recommend innovative and far-reaching practices that exceed existing industry standards. The recommendations complement each other by encouraging both types of market participants to hold the other more accountable.* * *
The Executive Summary of the Report, reproduced (along with the Report's "Table of Contents") by Asiaing online, noted its importance to private investors, institutional investors, and fiduciary investors:
Thousands of institutional and individual investors meet the legal requirements to invest in hedge funds, but it is not always appropriate for them to do so.

Prudent evaluation and management of hedge fund investments may require specific knowledge of a range of investment strategies, relevant risks, legal and regulatory constraints, taxation, accounting, valuation, liquidity, and reporting considerations.


Fiduciaries must take appropriate steps to determine whether an allocation of assets to hedge funds contributes to an institution’s investment objectives, and whether internal staff or agents of the institution have sufficient resources and expertise to effectively manage a hedge fund component of an investment portfolio. * * *
Are you an investor or a fiduciary who is considering a hedge fund investment, or do you advise one about such an investment? Then you must read the Report.

Update: 07/29/08:

On July 29, 2008,
The Wall Street Journal's "Wealth Report", noted in a posting entitled "Wealthy Investors Cling to Hedge Funds" that "[d]espite all the bad press about hedge-fund performance recently, a Bank of America survey found that hedge funds are still popular with the rich."
The survey, of 400 clients with $3 million or more in investible assets, found that more than half of those with hedge-fund investments were “satisfied” with the funds’ performance.

That compares with an approval rating of just 30% for traditional investments such as stocks and bonds. Other alternatives also fared better than stocks and bonds: a 41% approval rating for venture capital, 41% for real-estate, and 35% for private equity. * * *

So the poor performance of hedge funds beats the horrid performance of stocks. The survey also found that investors who had held hedge funds the longest were the most satisfied. Those who had been investing in hedge funds for 10 years or more were twice as likely as those with less experience to be “extremely satisfied” — probably because they had all those heady days of double-digit returns to factor in to their assessment.

The critical question is whether the rich will keep putting money into hedge funds. Funding for new funds is drying up: In the U.S. the number of new funds has dropped by half. It’s about the same in Europe. * * *
Update: 09/06/08:

NBC News
broadcast a Dateline NBC segment
by correspondent Dennis Murphy on Friday, September 5, 2008, at 10:00 p.m., entitled "Mystery of the missing millionaire."
A wealthy hedge fund manager whom the rich and powerful trusted with their fortunes suddenly disappears – and the money was gone too. Turns out, all along he'd been playing a dangerous game with very high stakes. Dennis Murphy reports.
The description of the investigative report explores "hedge funds" and their managers, and reinforces some of the concerns expressed in recent years:
This giddy era, before the market’s recent swan dive, was dubbed “the new gilded age” and some of the young men becoming as rich as any Rockefeller or Andrew Carnegie of days past were masters of something known on Wall Street as a "hedge fund."

Top hedge fund managers have been reported to make anywhere from $100 million to a billion dollars a year. They do it by making already wealthy people and institutions even richer.

Someone who wanted in on the hedge fund action in the worst way was Samuel Israel III. He was a Wall Street guy who’d worked his way up here and there in the ‘80s and ‘90s as a trader. * * *

A hedge fund, like the one Sam Israel was starting up, is like a private club for wealthy investors. It usually takes a million dollars to get in the door.

And the very best hedge fund managers are a high priesthood of brilliant traders. They place complex bets that can pay off handsomely, even when others are losing their shirts. * * *

The website for the recent broadcast segment referenced a previous helpful MSNBC commentary, "What is the deal with hedge funds?" (08/27/07), by John W. Schoen, Senior Producer.